Showing posts with label CCSS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CCSS. Show all posts

Monday, January 27, 2014

Scratching My Head about Common Core by Larry Lee

Education Matters

By Larry Lee

Pardon me while I scratch my head, but I’m still confused as to what all the “common core” talk is about.

And if the truth be known I suspect the vast majority of Alabamians don’t know common core from apple core.  Still, this doesn’t stop the mention of it from stirring passion in some, especially the well-meaning folks who call themselves Tea Party types.

One reason I’m confused is because I don’t know which Republican to believe.

John Legg is a Republican state senator who chairs the Florida Senate Education committee, a former teacher and lives near Tampa.  A few months ago he wrote an article Why Conservatives Support Common Core State Standards.

He said, “The movement to Common Core asserts higher-order thinking across the disciplines and concepts, which will yield a higher quality of comprehension for students, ensuring they are prepared for college, the workforce or to become a business owner/job creator.  Common Core is a set of academic standards and does not pose an identity or security risk to students.”

On the other hand our own Republican state senator Scott Beason spoke a few days ago to an anti-Common Core rally in Montgomery.  He read his fifth-grade daughter’s reading assignment about the benefits of hybrid cars and called it an example of socialist indoctrination since the implication was that hybrid cars do not cause as much pollution as ones with internal combustion engines.

(Wow, my sister has a hybrid vehicle.  Did not know she was a socialist.  She may be the only one to ever graduate from Auburn University.)

Two Republican state senators.  One supports Common Core, one doesn’t.  Which one should I believe?

At this point, trying to sort through my confusion I did what I usually do when it comes to education issues—I went to the experts.  In this case, school superintendents, principals and teachers who are largely being ignored in this debate.  I doubt that, unlike Senator
Beason, they are experts on hybrid cars and socialism, but I do think they know a lot about education.

They quickly got me to understand that Common Core refers to standards—not curriculum.  I also learned that Alabama used the Common Core, adjusted them to fit Alabama students and adopted the Alabama College & Career Ready standards.

As one teacher explained, “These standards encourage teachers to help students think, apply, and create, instead of ‘sit and get’ instruction.  Students make relevant and real-world connections across the disciplines.”

What do the experts think about what Alabama is doing?

Of the 50+ I talked to, not a single one disagrees with the move.

“I have seen teachers re-energized.  One first-grade teacher came to me with tears in her eyes and said that she had been in a rut and what she is now doing has brought joy back to her classroom,” said one longtime principal.

“We just had a school that exceeded national benchmarks in all content areas.  I asked why this happened. The principal said that her teachers are finally able to teach again,” said a central office specialist.

“The standards are about doing what is right for the children, their future and their success.  I don’t understand why adults in today’s society try to use children as a bargaining chip to promote their own agenda,” commented a Torchbearer school principal.

“We are spending time teaching teachers how to stop surface teaching and start expecting deeper use of and knowledge connected to writing and reading…developing a love of learning,” explained a superintendent.

“I love the college and career ready standards.  It enables us to see how we measure up.  I believe that Alabama schools are as good as those in other states,” said a principal.

“These standards are stronger than any we’ve ever had, no question.  As long as we can teach and assess how we want, I’ll stand behind them 100%,” stated a principal of 20 years.

From a teacher of two decades, “Our new standards are one of the best things we’ve done in Alabama.  We’re all finally saying that ‘sage on the stage’ teaching is ineffective and teachers must get students invested in their own learning. Less rote memorization and more thinking and application.”

“The legislature needs to pause, take a breath and consider the repercussions of their decisions.  Teachers, children and parents are simply in the boat without a paddle and the legislature is the wind shifting directions without knowing why, when, or where,” summed up a superintendent.

After going through these comments—and many more—I’ll throw out a suggestion.  Perhaps some elected officials should visit a few schools rather than speaking at rallies.  I’ll even give them a ride in my car, which is not a hybrid.

Larry Lee led the study, Lessons Learned from Rural Schools, and is a long-time advocate for public education and frequently writes about education issues.  larrylee33@knology.net


Thursday, May 2, 2013

Common Core and Social Justice


@beth_thomason teaches class warfare and social justice. pic.twitter.com


This is a tweet I saw yesterday on Twitter.  At first, I just shook my head with the absurdity of it, and then, for whatever reason, I replied to the tweet.  Couldn't resist.

Show me the standard that does that. Doesn't exist. “@beth_thomason teaches class warfare and social justice.


There were were several dozen exchanges between the two us.  I respected her passion.  She sent me Glenn Beck and Michelle Malkin links to prove her points.  I responded with first-hand classroom experience and a very thorough knowledge of the math and English Common Core standards.   The tweetfest ended cordially, although I can't say "cordial" would describe the tone of the whole thread. 

Over the last few months, we've heard a lot about the Common Core and how it teaches "social justice."  I'm gonna save a thorough study of social justice for another post, but I wanted to spend a few minutes addressing this assignment we see here today. 

First, you need to know a few things about this workbook.  It is not necessarily a school text or assignment. The tweet-er saw it at a bookstore and noticed it had "Common Core Aligned" on the front cover.  As a Common Core opponent,  her interest was piqued, and she began flipping through the pages.   Obviously, she paused to take a picture of the image you see above.  Let's pause as well and look over the lesson....

I taught 9th and 11th grade histories in a private Christian school, using faith-based texts.  I taught about social classes, as well as the caste system in India.  IT WAS IN THE TEXT.  It's also in the BIBLE. Kids need to know about social classes, as it's an important dynamic in many societies, including our own.  Upon looking more closely at the assignment, I remember very similar exercises when I was a child.  

The workbook was a Carson Dellosa workbook, often used by parents, including those who homeschool, for further studies. During the summers, I bought similar workbooks to teach my children geography, the skeletal system, and American history. This text is what we call "supplemental material."

The most important thing to note is, and listen carefully, there are no Common Core history standards, at least none that I've seen. The reason this text is "aligned" with the Common Core is because it likely addresses the Common Core History Content Literacy Standards, meaning students will read, write, and think about history.These standards are found in the Common Core English Language Arts document. There is no history content mentioned in them. The teacher can decide the content (although to be fair, that flexibility can vary state to state, district to district).

Just to clarify a bit more, these content literacy standards (for history and science) help our schools address the 70% informational text suggestion in the English Language Arts Common Core Standards. Literacy is to be shared with all content areas, not just the English teachers, which makes a lot of sense. Good history and science teachers have also addressed these standards anyway, so these standards are no great revelations to us. However, they do remind the less than stellar teachers to get their acts together.


So let me bring this all home. When folks talk about "Common Core" pushing social justice, homosexuality, environmentalism, feminism, and socialism (to name a few), remember this: these ideals are not found in the math and English Common Core standards.

Now, I'm not naive. I know much of our media, texts (including some school texts), news, and periodicals have long been on the "liberal" side of things. I get that. However, Common Core standards have nothing to do with that. Folks want to take a stand against far-left material? Go for it, but please leave the math and English standards out of it.




(6th-8th Grade)


Key Ideas and Details
  • CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.1 Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.
  • CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.2 Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary of the source distinct from prior knowledge or opinions.
  • CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.3 Identify key steps in a text’s description of a process related to history/social studies (e.g., how a bill becomes law, how interest rates are raised or lowered).

Craft and Structure

  • CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.4 Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including vocabulary specific to domains related to history/social studies.
  • CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.5 Describe how a text presents information (e.g., sequentially, comparatively, causally).
  • CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.6 Identify aspects of a text that reveal an author’s point of view or purpose (e.g., loaded language, inclusion or avoidance of particular facts).

Integration of Knowledge and Ideas

Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity

  • CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.10 By the end of grade 8, read and comprehend history/social studies texts in the grades 6–8 text complexity band independently and proficiently.